Alameda, CA vs Grayslake, IL
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Alameda
63.4
#1768 nationally
Grayslake
76.3
#362 nationally
Grayslake leads in crime level (1.8 vs 8.7). Alameda leads in walk score (68 vs 28). Grayslake leads in cost of living index (108 vs 206).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Alameda, CA | Grayslake, IL |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63.4 (#1768) | 76.3 (#362) |
| Population | 75,353 | 20,954 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,156,096 | $374,561 |
| Median Household Income | $129,917 | $110,662 |
| Average Commute | 33.4 min | 28.7 min |
| Walk Score | 68 | 28 |
| Crime Level | 8.7 | 1.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 206 | 108 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+53.6 | D+20.8 |
D
63.4 Score
Alameda, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$1,156,096
Population
75,353
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
68
Pacific
View Alameda, CA →
C
76.3 Score
Grayslake, IL
Small Illinois city with local appeal
Median Home
$374,561
Population
20,954
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
Midwest
View Grayslake, IL →
Try a different matchup
Swap Alameda for: