Alameda, CA vs Pittsfield, MA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Alameda
63.4
#1768 nationally
Pittsfield
72.6
#864 nationally
Alameda leads in median household income ($129,917 vs $66,859). Pittsfield leads in cost of living index (107 vs 206). Pittsfield leads in average commute (17.8 min vs 33.4 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Alameda, CA | Pittsfield, MA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63.4 (#1768) | 72.6 (#864) |
| Population | 75,353 | 43,076 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,156,096 | $313,325 |
| Median Household Income | $129,917 | $66,859 |
| Average Commute | 33.4 min | 17.8 min |
| Walk Score | 68 | 40 |
| Crime Level | 8.7 | 14.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 206 | 107 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+53.6 | D+39.9 |
D
63.4 Score
Alameda, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$1,156,096
Population
75,353
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
68
Pacific
View Alameda, CA →
C-
72.6 Score
Pittsfield, MA
Small Massachusetts city with local appeal
Median Home
$313,325
Population
43,076
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
40
Northeast
View Pittsfield, MA →