Antioch, CA vs McKinney, TX
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Antioch
57.9
#1957 nationally
McKinney
73.5
#726 nationally
Antioch leads in walk score (41 vs 24). McKinney leads in average commute (30.2 min vs 44.9 min). McKinney leads in cost of living index (111 vs 149).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Antioch, CA | McKinney, TX |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 57.9 (#1957) | 73.5 (#726) |
| Population | 117,096 | 208,867 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $595,248 | $480,265 |
| Median Household Income | $90,709 | $108,542 |
| Average Commute | 44.9 min | 30.2 min |
| Walk Score | 41 | 24 |
| Crime Level | 16.6 | Very Low |
| School Rating | N/A | 8.8 |
| Cost of Living Index | 149 | 111 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+38.0 | R+11.2 |
F
57.9 Score
Antioch, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$595,248
Population
117,096
Crime
High
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Antioch, CA →
C
73.5 Score
McKinney, TX
Historic downtown meets modern growth
Median Home
$480,265
Population
208,867
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A
Southwest
View McKinney, TX →