Ashland, OR vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Ashland
68.9
#1267 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Ashland leads in average commute (16.3 min vs 33 min). Rancho Cucamonga leads in median household income ($105,534 vs $64,767). Ashland leads in walk score (55 vs 41).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Ashland, OR | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 68.9 (#1267) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 21,061 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $559,336 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $64,767 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 16.3 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 55 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 6.9 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 140 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+6.4 | R+2.1 |
D+
68.9 Score
Ashland, OR
Small Oregon city with local appeal
Median Home
$559,336
Population
21,061
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
55
Pacific
View Ashland, OR →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Ashland for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: