Bakersfield, CA vs Clinton, MS
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Bakersfield
66.5
#1531 nationally
Clinton
79.4
#122 nationally
Clinton leads in crime level (1.9 vs 15.2). Bakersfield leads in walk score (37 vs 19). Clinton leads in cost of living index (96 vs 123).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Bakersfield, CA | Clinton, MS |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 66.5 (#1531) | 79.4 (#122) |
| Population | 413,381 | 26,698 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $391,030 | $239,559 |
| Median Household Income | $73,827 | $71,315 |
| Average Commute | 23.6 min | 25.8 min |
| Walk Score | 37 | 19 |
| Crime Level | 15.2 | 1.9 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 123 | 96 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+21.1 | D+46.1 |
D
66.5 Score
Bakersfield, CA
Growing California city with expanding opportunities
Median Home
$391,030
Population
413,381
Crime
High
Walk Score
37
Pacific
View Bakersfield, CA →
C+
79.4 Score
Clinton, MS
Small Mississippi city with local appeal
Median Home
$239,559
Population
26,698
Crime
Low
Walk Score
19
Southeast
View Clinton, MS →