Bakersfield, CA vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Bakersfield
66.5
#1531 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga leads in crime level (8.0 vs 15.2). Rancho Cucamonga leads in median household income ($105,534 vs $73,827). Bakersfield leads in average commute (23.6 min vs 33 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Bakersfield, CA | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 66.5 (#1531) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 413,381 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $391,030 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $73,827 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 23.6 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 37 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 15.2 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 123 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+21.1 | R+2.1 |
D
66.5 Score
Bakersfield, CA
Growing California city with expanding opportunities
Median Home
$391,030
Population
413,381
Crime
High
Walk Score
37
Pacific
View Bakersfield, CA →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Bakersfield for: