Baldwin Park, CA vs Fishers, IN
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Baldwin Park
62.1
#1872 nationally
Fishers
76.4
#349 nationally
Baldwin Park leads in walk score (55 vs 22). Fishers leads in median household income ($115,126 vs $76,002). Fishers leads in cost of living index (101 vs 145).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Baldwin Park, CA | Fishers, IN |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.1 (#1872) | 76.4 (#349) |
| Population | 68,806 | 103,842 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $722,278 | $449,366 |
| Median Household Income | $76,002 | $115,126 |
| Average Commute | 30.5 min | 24.8 min |
| Walk Score | 55 | 22 |
| Crime Level | 11.1 | Very Low |
| School Rating | N/A | 8.8 |
| Cost of Living Index | 145 | 101 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | R+6.1 |
D-
62.1 Score
Baldwin Park, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$722,278
Population
68,806
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
55
Pacific
View Baldwin Park, CA →
C
76.4 Score
Fishers, IN
Young families find their perfect fit
Median Home
$449,366
Population
103,842
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A
Midwest
View Fishers, IN →
Try a different matchup
Swap Baldwin Park for: