Baldwin Park, CA vs Grayslake, IL
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Baldwin Park
62.1
#1872 nationally
Grayslake
76.3
#362 nationally
Grayslake leads in crime level (1.8 vs 11.1). Baldwin Park leads in walk score (55 vs 28). Grayslake leads in median household income ($110,662 vs $76,002).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Baldwin Park, CA | Grayslake, IL |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.1 (#1872) | 76.3 (#362) |
| Population | 68,806 | 20,954 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $722,278 | $374,561 |
| Median Household Income | $76,002 | $110,662 |
| Average Commute | 30.5 min | 28.7 min |
| Walk Score | 55 | 28 |
| Crime Level | 11.1 | 1.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 145 | 108 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | D+20.8 |
D-
62.1 Score
Baldwin Park, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$722,278
Population
68,806
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
55
Pacific
View Baldwin Park, CA →
C
76.3 Score
Grayslake, IL
Small Illinois city with local appeal
Median Home
$374,561
Population
20,954
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
Midwest
View Grayslake, IL →
Try a different matchup
Swap Baldwin Park for: