Banning, CA vs Bluffdale, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Banning
63.9
#1728 nationally
Bluffdale
67.4
#1423 nationally
Bluffdale leads in crime level (5.1 vs 12.8). Bluffdale leads in median household income ($119,009 vs $54,083). Bluffdale leads in average commute (22.2 min vs 28 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Banning, CA | Bluffdale, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63.9 (#1728) | 67.4 (#1423) |
| Population | 31,680 | 19,090 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $411,599 | $617,036 |
| Median Household Income | $54,083 | $119,009 |
| Average Commute | 28 min | 22.2 min |
| Walk Score | 29 | N/A |
| Crime Level | 12.8 | 5.1 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 118 | 141 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+1.3 | D+10.2 |
Data coverage note: Bluffdale is missing data for 1 metric that Banning has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
D
63.9 Score
Banning, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$411,599
Population
31,680
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
29
Pacific
View Banning, CA →
D+
67.4 Score
Bluffdale, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$617,036
Population
19,090
Crime
Moderate-Low
Median Income
$119,009
West
View Bluffdale, UT →