Banning, CA vs Frisco, TX
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Banning
63.9
#1728 nationally
Frisco
72.4
#895 nationally
Frisco leads in median household income ($134,891 vs $54,083). Banning leads in walk score (29 vs 26). Banning leads in average commute (28 min vs 29.4 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Banning, CA | Frisco, TX |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63.9 (#1728) | 72.4 (#895) |
| Population | 31,680 | 219,587 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $411,599 | $649,173 |
| Median Household Income | $54,083 | $134,891 |
| Average Commute | 28 min | 29.4 min |
| Walk Score | 29 | 26 |
| Crime Level | 12.8 | Very Low |
| School Rating | N/A | 9.2 |
| Cost of Living Index | 118 | 118 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+1.3 | R+11.2 |
D
63.9 Score
Banning, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$411,599
Population
31,680
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
29
Pacific
View Banning, CA →
C-
72.4 Score
Frisco, TX
Sports City USA
Median Home
$649,173
Population
219,587
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A+
Southwest
View Frisco, TX →