Banning, CA vs Pico Rivera, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Banning
63.9
#1728 nationally
Pico Rivera
62.5
#1852 nationally
Pico Rivera leads in walk score (59 vs 29). Pico Rivera leads in median household income ($82,539 vs $54,083). Banning leads in cost of living index (118 vs 148).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Banning, CA | Pico Rivera, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63.9 (#1728) | 62.5 (#1852) |
| Population | 31,680 | 59,189 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $411,599 | $753,964 |
| Median Household Income | $54,083 | $82,539 |
| Average Commute | 28 min | 30.8 min |
| Walk Score | 29 | 59 |
| Crime Level | 12.8 | 12.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 118 | 148 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+1.3 | D+32.9 |
D
63.9 Score
Banning, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$411,599
Population
31,680
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
29
Pacific
View Banning, CA →
D-
62.5 Score
Pico Rivera, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$753,964
Population
59,189
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
59
Pacific
View Pico Rivera, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Banning for: