Banning, CA vs Pullman, WA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Banning
63.9
#1728 nationally
Pullman
72.5
#882 nationally
Pullman leads in crime level (3.6 vs 12.8). Pullman leads in average commute (13.6 min vs 28 min). Pullman leads in walk score (42 vs 29).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Banning, CA | Pullman, WA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63.9 (#1728) | 72.5 (#882) |
| Population | 31,680 | 32,863 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $411,599 | $435,863 |
| Median Household Income | $54,083 | $41,479 |
| Average Commute | 28 min | 13.6 min |
| Walk Score | 29 | 42 |
| Crime Level | 12.8 | 3.6 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 118 | 118 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+1.3 | D+9.0 |
D
63.9 Score
Banning, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$411,599
Population
31,680
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
29
Pacific
View Banning, CA →
C-
72.5 Score
Pullman, WA
Small Washington city with local appeal
Median Home
$435,863
Population
32,863
Crime
Low
Walk Score
42
Pacific
View Pullman, WA →