Bellingham, WA vs Pasadena, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Bellingham
66.3
#1553 nationally
Pasadena
61.6
#1898 nationally
Pasadena leads in median household income ($97,818 vs $64,026). Bellingham leads in average commute (18.7 min vs 27.9 min). Bellingham leads in cost of living index (137 vs 197).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Bellingham, WA | Pasadena, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 66.3 (#1553) | 61.6 (#1898) |
| Population | 94,720 | 133,560 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $672,756 | $1,206,740 |
| Median Household Income | $64,026 | $97,818 |
| Average Commute | 18.7 min | 27.9 min |
| Walk Score | 49 | 69 |
| Crime Level | 9.6 | 13.2 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 137 | 197 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+24.9 | D+32.9 |
D
66.3 Score
Bellingham, WA
Washington community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$672,756
Population
94,720
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
49
Pacific
View Bellingham, WA →
D-
61.6 Score
Pasadena, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$1,206,740
Population
133,560
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
69
Pacific
View Pasadena, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Bellingham for: