Burnsville, MN vs Worcester, MA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Burnsville
73.5
#719 nationally
Worcester
66.6
#1530 nationally
Worcester leads in walk score (62 vs 32). Burnsville leads in median household income ($85,801 vs $52,891). Burnsville leads in average commute (23.6 min vs 26.4 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Burnsville, MN | Worcester, MA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 73.5 (#719) | 66.6 (#1530) |
| Population | 64,772 | 206,518 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $373,685 | $441,802 |
| Median Household Income | $85,801 | $52,891 |
| Average Commute | 23.6 min | 26.4 min |
| Walk Score | 32 | 62 |
| Crime Level | 5.7 | Moderate-High |
| School Rating | N/A | 5.2 |
| Cost of Living Index | 112 | 108 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+12.9 | D+10.0 |
C
73.5 Score
Burnsville, MN
Minnesota community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$373,685
Population
64,772
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
32
Midwest
View Burnsville, MN →
D
66.6 Score
Worcester, MA
Heart of the Commonwealth
Median Home
$441,802
Population
206,518
Crime
Moderate-High
Schools
C
Northeast
View Worcester, MA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Burnsville for: