Chelsea, MA vs Eureka, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Chelsea
62.7
#1829 nationally
Eureka
67.5
#1409 nationally
Eureka leads in average commute (15.6 min vs 34.1 min). Chelsea leads in median household income ($71,051 vs $51,971). Chelsea leads in walk score (81 vs 69).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Chelsea, MA | Eureka, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.7 (#1829) | 67.5 (#1409) |
| Population | 38,319 | 25,734 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $531,983 | $412,974 |
| Median Household Income | $71,051 | $51,971 |
| Average Commute | 34.1 min | 15.6 min |
| Walk Score | 81 | 69 |
| Crime Level | 26.8 | 27.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 135 | 124 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+52.5 | D+28.4 |
D-
62.7 Score
Chelsea, MA
Small Massachusetts city with local appeal
Median Home
$531,983
Population
38,319
Crime
Very High
Walk Score
81
Northeast
View Chelsea, MA →
D+
67.5 Score
Eureka, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$412,974
Population
25,734
Crime
Very High
Walk Score
69
Pacific
View Eureka, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Chelsea for:
Swap Eureka for: