Chelsea, MA vs Pasadena, TX
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Chelsea
62.7
#1829 nationally
Pasadena
75.2
#490 nationally
Chelsea leads in walk score (81 vs 43). Pasadena leads in crime level (15.5 vs 26.8). Pasadena leads in cost of living index (94 vs 135).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Chelsea, MA | Pasadena, TX |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.7 (#1829) | 75.2 (#490) |
| Population | 38,319 | 146,716 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $531,983 | $218,827 |
| Median Household Income | $71,051 | $64,698 |
| Average Commute | 34.1 min | 25.7 min |
| Walk Score | 81 | 43 |
| Crime Level | 26.8 | 15.5 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 135 | 94 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+52.5 | D+5.5 |
D-
62.7 Score
Chelsea, MA
Small Massachusetts city with local appeal
Median Home
$531,983
Population
38,319
Crime
Very High
Walk Score
81
Northeast
View Chelsea, MA →
C
75.2 Score
Pasadena, TX
Mid-size Texas city with community character
Median Home
$218,827
Population
146,716
Crime
High
Walk Score
43
Southwest
View Pasadena, TX →