Chino Hills, CA vs Payson, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Chino Hills
62.7
#1830 nationally
Payson
72.9
#812 nationally
Payson leads in average commute (21 min vs 37.5 min). Payson leads in cost of living index (111 vs 177). Payson leads in walk score (36 vs 23).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Chino Hills, CA | Payson, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.7 (#1830) | 72.9 (#812) |
| Population | 77,212 | 24,054 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $985,223 | $477,164 |
| Median Household Income | $117,548 | $81,387 |
| Average Commute | 37.5 min | 21 min |
| Walk Score | 23 | 36 |
| Crime Level | 3.8 | 3.5 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 177 | 111 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+2.1 | R+39.8 |
D-
62.7 Score
Chino Hills, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$985,223
Population
77,212
Crime
Low
Walk Score
23
Pacific
View Chino Hills, CA →
C-
72.9 Score
Payson, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$477,164
Population
24,054
Crime
Low
Walk Score
36
West
View Payson, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Chino Hills for: