Claremont, CA vs Converse, TX
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Claremont
61.8
#1888 nationally
Converse
74.4
#592 nationally
Claremont leads in walk score (48 vs 24). Converse leads in cost of living index (101 vs 173). Claremont leads in median household income ($115,091 vs $77,237).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Claremont, CA | Converse, TX |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 61.8 (#1888) | 74.4 (#592) |
| Population | 35,640 | 30,321 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,037,849 | $243,003 |
| Median Household Income | $115,091 | $77,237 |
| Average Commute | 27.5 min | 28 min |
| Walk Score | 48 | 24 |
| Crime Level | 13.7 | 10.1 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 173 | 101 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | D+9.8 |
D-
61.8 Score
Claremont, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,037,849
Population
35,640
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
48
Pacific
View Claremont, CA →
C
74.4 Score
Converse, TX
Small Texas city with local appeal
Median Home
$243,003
Population
30,321
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
24
Southwest
View Converse, TX →
Try a different matchup
Swap Claremont for: