Claremont, CA vs Highland, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Claremont
61.8
#1888 nationally
Highland
67.2
#1450 nationally
Highland leads in crime level (2.6 vs 13.7). Highland leads in median household income ($166,429 vs $115,091). Highland leads in average commute (22.7 min vs 27.5 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Claremont, CA | Highland, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 61.8 (#1888) | 67.2 (#1450) |
| Population | 35,640 | 20,217 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,037,849 | $975,621 |
| Median Household Income | $115,091 | $166,429 |
| Average Commute | 27.5 min | 22.7 min |
| Walk Score | 48 | N/A |
| Crime Level | 13.7 | 2.6 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 173 | 160 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | R+39.8 |
Data coverage note: Highland is missing data for 1 metric that Claremont has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
D-
61.8 Score
Claremont, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,037,849
Population
35,640
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
48
Pacific
View Claremont, CA →
D+
67.2 Score
Highland, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$975,621
Population
20,217
Crime
Low
Median Income
$166,429
West
View Highland, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Claremont for: