Clermont, FL vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Clermont
66.4
#1545 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga leads in walk score (41 vs 21). Clermont leads in crime level (5.1 vs 8.0). Rancho Cucamonga leads in median household income ($105,534 vs $75,951).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Clermont, FL | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 66.4 (#1545) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 48,621 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $431,051 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $75,951 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 35.4 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 21 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 5.1 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 116 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+24.7 | R+2.1 |
D
66.4 Score
Clermont, FL
Small Florida city with local appeal
Median Home
$431,051
Population
48,621
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
21
Southeast
View Clermont, FL →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Clermont for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: