Concord, CA vs Grayslake, IL
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Concord
62.4
#1856 nationally
Grayslake
76.3
#362 nationally
Grayslake leads in crime level (1.8 vs 13.3). Concord leads in walk score (49 vs 28). Grayslake leads in cost of living index (108 vs 166).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Concord, CA | Grayslake, IL |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.4 (#1856) | 76.3 (#362) |
| Population | 122,315 | 20,954 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $733,409 | $374,561 |
| Median Household Income | $107,789 | $110,662 |
| Average Commute | 33.6 min | 28.7 min |
| Walk Score | 49 | 28 |
| Crime Level | 13.3 | 1.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 166 | 108 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+38.0 | D+20.8 |
D-
62.4 Score
Concord, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$733,409
Population
122,315
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
49
Pacific
View Concord, CA →
C
76.3 Score
Grayslake, IL
Small Illinois city with local appeal
Median Home
$374,561
Population
20,954
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
Midwest
View Grayslake, IL →
Try a different matchup
Swap Concord for: