Corona, CA vs Gloucester, MA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Corona
62.4
#1857 nationally
Gloucester
64.2
#1710 nationally
Gloucester leads in average commute (25.5 min vs 35.3 min). Corona leads in median household income ($103,727 vs $84,465). Corona leads in crime level (6.8 vs 7.6).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Corona, CA | Gloucester, MA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.4 (#1857) | 64.2 (#1710) |
| Population | 160,238 | 29,959 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $762,969 | $784,115 |
| Median Household Income | $103,727 | $84,465 |
| Average Commute | 35.3 min | 25.5 min |
| Walk Score | 39 | 42 |
| Crime Level | 6.8 | 7.6 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 154 | 139 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+1.3 | D+20.3 |
D-
62.4 Score
Corona, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$762,969
Population
160,238
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
39
Pacific
View Corona, CA →
D
64.2 Score
Gloucester, MA
Small Massachusetts city with local appeal
Median Home
$784,115
Population
29,959
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
42
Northeast
View Gloucester, MA →