Corona, CA vs Los Angeles, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Corona
62.4
#1857 nationally
Los Angeles
60.9
#1917 nationally
Los Angeles leads in walk score (68 vs 39). Corona leads in median household income ($103,727 vs $74,891). Los Angeles leads in average commute (31.4 min vs 35.3 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Corona, CA | Los Angeles, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.4 (#1857) | 60.9 (#1917) |
| Population | 160,238 | 3,822,238 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $762,969 | $946,268 |
| Median Household Income | $103,727 | $74,891 |
| Average Commute | 35.3 min | 31.4 min |
| Walk Score | 39 | 68 |
| Crime Level | 6.8 | Moderate-High |
| School Rating | N/A | 5.4 |
| Cost of Living Index | 154 | 173 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+1.3 | D+32.9 |
D-
62.4 Score
Corona, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$762,969
Population
160,238
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
39
Pacific
View Corona, CA →
D-
60.9 Score
Los Angeles, CA
Entertainment capital of the world
Median Home
$946,268
Population
3,822,238
Crime
Moderate-High
Schools
C
Pacific
View Los Angeles, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Corona for: