Cudahy, CA vs Garner, NC
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Cudahy
59
#1951 nationally
Garner
68.5
#1312 nationally
Cudahy leads in walk score (62 vs 23). Garner leads in crime level (9.8 vs 17.9). Garner leads in median household income ($77,171 vs $49,596).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Cudahy, CA | Garner, NC |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 59 (#1951) | 68.5 (#1312) |
| Population | 21,723 | 35,265 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $697,308 | $385,396 |
| Median Household Income | $49,596 | $77,171 |
| Average Commute | 32.2 min | 27.8 min |
| Walk Score | 62 | 23 |
| Crime Level | 17.9 | 9.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 141 | 106 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | D+25.6 |
F
59 Score
Cudahy, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$697,308
Population
21,723
Crime
High
Walk Score
62
Pacific
View Cudahy, CA →
D+
68.5 Score
Garner, NC
Small North Carolina city with local appeal
Median Home
$385,396
Population
35,265
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
23
Southeast
View Garner, NC →