Cullman, AL vs Grayslake, IL
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Cullman
74
#641 nationally
Grayslake
76.3
#362 nationally
Grayslake leads in crime level (1.8 vs 5.9). Grayslake leads in median household income ($110,662 vs $59,982). Cullman leads in average commute (20.2 min vs 28.7 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Cullman, AL | Grayslake, IL |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 74 (#641) | 76.3 (#362) |
| Population | 19,913 | 20,954 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $264,322 | $374,561 |
| Median Household Income | $59,982 | $110,662 |
| Average Commute | 20.2 min | 28.7 min |
| Walk Score | N/A | 28 |
| Crime Level | 5.9 | 1.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 91 | 108 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+80.5 | D+20.8 |
Data coverage note: Cullman is missing data for 1 metric that Grayslake has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
C
74 Score
Cullman, AL
Small Alabama city with local appeal
Median Home
$264,322
Population
19,913
Crime
Moderate-Low
Median Income
$59,982
Southeast
View Cullman, AL →
C
76.3 Score
Grayslake, IL
Small Illinois city with local appeal
Median Home
$374,561
Population
20,954
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
Midwest
View Grayslake, IL →
Try a different matchup
Swap Cullman for: