Cullman, AL vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Cullman
74
#641 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga leads in median household income ($105,534 vs $59,982). Cullman leads in cost of living index (91 vs 159). Cullman leads in average commute (20.2 min vs 33 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Cullman, AL | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 74 (#641) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 19,913 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $264,322 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $59,982 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 20.2 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | N/A | 41 |
| Crime Level | 5.9 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 91 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+80.5 | R+2.1 |
Data coverage note: Cullman is missing data for 1 metric that Rancho Cucamonga has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
C
74 Score
Cullman, AL
Small Alabama city with local appeal
Median Home
$264,322
Population
19,913
Crime
Moderate-Low
Median Income
$59,982
Southeast
View Cullman, AL →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Cullman for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: