Culver City, CA vs Gresham, OR
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Culver City
60.8
#1921 nationally
Gresham
65.6
#1622 nationally
Gresham leads in cost of living index (124 vs 208). Culver City leads in median household income ($114,429 vs $69,437). Gresham leads in crime level (11.2 vs 18.3).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Culver City, CA | Gresham, OR |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 60.8 (#1921) | 65.6 (#1622) |
| Population | 39,041 | 110,685 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,287,430 | $470,730 |
| Median Household Income | $114,429 | $69,437 |
| Average Commute | 27.4 min | 27.5 min |
| Walk Score | 76 | 47 |
| Crime Level | 18.3 | 11.2 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 208 | 124 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+32.9 | D+62.1 |
D-
60.8 Score
Culver City, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,287,430
Population
39,041
Crime
High
Walk Score
76
Pacific
View Culver City, CA →
D
65.6 Score
Gresham, OR
Mid-size Oregon city with community character
Median Home
$470,730
Population
110,685
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
47
Pacific
View Gresham, OR →
Try a different matchup
Swap Culver City for: