Eagan, MN vs Washington, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Eagan
76.8
#310 nationally
Washington
70.3
#1120 nationally
Eagan leads in walk score (41 vs 15). Washington leads in average commute (15.4 min vs 23.2 min). Eagan leads in crime level (2.8 vs 4.1).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Eagan, MN | Washington, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 76.8 (#310) | 70.3 (#1120) |
| Population | 67,396 | 33,877 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $407,248 | $543,808 |
| Median Household Income | $104,101 | $94,655 |
| Average Commute | 23.2 min | 15.4 min |
| Walk Score | 41 | 15 |
| Crime Level | 2.8 | 4.1 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 117 | 122 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+12.9 | R+52.3 |
C
76.8 Score
Eagan, MN
Minnesota community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$407,248
Population
67,396
Crime
Low
Walk Score
41
Midwest
View Eagan, MN →
C-
70.3 Score
Washington, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$543,808
Population
33,877
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
15
West
View Washington, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Eagan for: