Fairfield, CA vs Lancaster, TX
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Fairfield
62.9
#1812 nationally
Lancaster
69.9
#1155 nationally
Fairfield leads in walk score (37 vs 22). Lancaster leads in cost of living index (98 vs 151). Fairfield leads in median household income ($98,857 vs $65,323).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Fairfield, CA | Lancaster, TX |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.9 (#1812) | 69.9 (#1155) |
| Population | 120,768 | 40,215 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $605,863 | $273,149 |
| Median Household Income | $98,857 | $65,323 |
| Average Commute | 32.3 min | 29.7 min |
| Walk Score | 37 | 22 |
| Crime Level | 13.6 | 11.2 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 151 | 98 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+23.0 | D+22.2 |
D-
62.9 Score
Fairfield, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$605,863
Population
120,768
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
37
Pacific
View Fairfield, CA →
D+
69.9 Score
Lancaster, TX
Small Texas city with local appeal
Median Home
$273,149
Population
40,215
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
22
Southwest
View Lancaster, TX →
Try a different matchup
Swap Fairfield for: