Fairfield, CA vs Reedley, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Fairfield
62.9
#1812 nationally
Reedley
66.5
#1539 nationally
Fairfield leads in median household income ($98,857 vs $61,629). Reedley leads in average commute (23.4 min vs 32.3 min). Reedley leads in walk score (50 vs 37).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Fairfield, CA | Reedley, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 62.9 (#1812) | 66.5 (#1539) |
| Population | 120,768 | 25,958 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $605,863 | $391,683 |
| Median Household Income | $98,857 | $61,629 |
| Average Commute | 32.3 min | 23.4 min |
| Walk Score | 37 | 50 |
| Crime Level | 13.6 | 15.5 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 151 | 117 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+23.0 | R+4.4 |
D-
62.9 Score
Fairfield, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$605,863
Population
120,768
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
37
Pacific
View Fairfield, CA →
D
66.5 Score
Reedley, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$391,683
Population
25,958
Crime
High
Walk Score
50
Pacific
View Reedley, CA →