Farmington, UT vs Pasadena, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Farmington
69.7
#1174 nationally
Pasadena
61.6
#1898 nationally
Farmington leads in crime level (1.7 vs 13.2). Pasadena leads in walk score (69 vs 19). Farmington leads in cost of living index (130 vs 197).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Farmington, UT | Pasadena, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 69.7 (#1174) | 61.6 (#1898) |
| Population | 25,771 | 133,560 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $694,723 | $1,206,740 |
| Median Household Income | $115,278 | $97,818 |
| Average Commute | 22.1 min | 27.9 min |
| Walk Score | 19 | 69 |
| Crime Level | 1.7 | 13.2 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 130 | 197 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+24.9 | D+32.9 |
D+
69.7 Score
Farmington, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$694,723
Population
25,771
Crime
Low
Walk Score
19
West
View Farmington, UT →
D-
61.6 Score
Pasadena, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$1,206,740
Population
133,560
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
69
Pacific
View Pasadena, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Farmington for: