Fate, TX vs Rolling Meadows, IL
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Fate
73.8
#671 nationally
Rolling Meadows
77.3
#260 nationally
Fate leads in crime level (1.6 vs 2.7). Fate leads in median household income ($121,935 vs $91,287). Rolling Meadows leads in average commute (26.6 min vs 35 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Fate, TX | Rolling Meadows, IL |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 73.8 (#671) | 77.3 (#260) |
| Population | 24,626 | 23,329 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $359,854 | $342,521 |
| Median Household Income | $121,935 | $91,287 |
| Average Commute | 35 min | 26.6 min |
| Walk Score | N/A | 42 |
| Crime Level | 1.6 | 2.7 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 120 | 111 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+40.9 | D+42.0 |
Data coverage note: Fate is missing data for 1 metric that Rolling Meadows has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
C
73.8 Score
Fate, TX
Small Texas city with local appeal
Median Home
$359,854
Population
24,626
Crime
Low
Median Income
$121,935
Southwest
View Fate, TX →
C+
77.3 Score
Rolling Meadows, IL
Small Illinois city with local appeal
Median Home
$342,521
Population
23,329
Crime
Low
Walk Score
42
Midwest
View Rolling Meadows, IL →
Try a different matchup
Swap Fate for: