Fishers, IN vs Holladay, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Fishers
76.4
#349 nationally
Holladay
69.6
#1185 nationally
Holladay leads in walk score (36 vs 22). Fishers leads in cost of living index (101 vs 139). Holladay leads in average commute (19.4 min vs 24.8 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Fishers, IN | Holladay, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 76.4 (#349) | 69.6 (#1185) |
| Population | 103,842 | 30,298 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $449,366 | $851,133 |
| Median Household Income | $115,126 | $106,099 |
| Average Commute | 24.8 min | 19.4 min |
| Walk Score | 22 | 36 |
| Crime Level | Very Low | 2.7 |
| School Rating | 8.8 | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 101 | 139 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+6.1 | D+10.2 |
C
76.4 Score
Fishers, IN
Young families find their perfect fit
Median Home
$449,366
Population
103,842
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A
Midwest
View Fishers, IN →
D+
69.6 Score
Holladay, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$851,133
Population
30,298
Crime
Low
Walk Score
36
West
View Holladay, UT →
Try a different matchup
Swap Fishers for: