Fishers, IN vs Pittsfield, MA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Fishers
76.4
#349 nationally
Pittsfield
72.6
#864 nationally
Pittsfield leads in walk score (40 vs 22). Fishers leads in median household income ($115,126 vs $66,859). Pittsfield leads in average commute (17.8 min vs 24.8 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Fishers, IN | Pittsfield, MA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 76.4 (#349) | 72.6 (#864) |
| Population | 103,842 | 43,076 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $449,366 | $313,325 |
| Median Household Income | $115,126 | $66,859 |
| Average Commute | 24.8 min | 17.8 min |
| Walk Score | 22 | 40 |
| Crime Level | Very Low | 14.0 |
| School Rating | 8.8 | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 101 | 107 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+6.1 | D+39.9 |
C
76.4 Score
Fishers, IN
Young families find their perfect fit
Median Home
$449,366
Population
103,842
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A
Midwest
View Fishers, IN →
C-
72.6 Score
Pittsfield, MA
Small Massachusetts city with local appeal
Median Home
$313,325
Population
43,076
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
40
Northeast
View Pittsfield, MA →