Fishers, IN vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Fishers
76.4
#349 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga leads in walk score (41 vs 22). Fishers leads in cost of living index (101 vs 159). Fishers leads in average commute (24.8 min vs 33 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Fishers, IN | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 76.4 (#349) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 103,842 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $449,366 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $115,126 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 24.8 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 22 | 41 |
| Crime Level | Very Low | 8.0 |
| School Rating | 8.8 | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 101 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+6.1 | R+2.1 |
C
76.4 Score
Fishers, IN
Young families find their perfect fit
Median Home
$449,366
Population
103,842
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A
Midwest
View Fishers, IN →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Fishers for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: