Fishers, IN vs Reedley, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Fishers
76.4
#349 nationally
Reedley
66.5
#1539 nationally
Reedley leads in walk score (50 vs 22). Fishers leads in median household income ($115,126 vs $61,629). Fishers leads in cost of living index (101 vs 117).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Fishers, IN | Reedley, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 76.4 (#349) | 66.5 (#1539) |
| Population | 103,842 | 25,958 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $449,366 | $391,683 |
| Median Household Income | $115,126 | $61,629 |
| Average Commute | 24.8 min | 23.4 min |
| Walk Score | 22 | 50 |
| Crime Level | Very Low | 15.5 |
| School Rating | 8.8 | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 101 | 117 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+6.1 | R+4.4 |
C
76.4 Score
Fishers, IN
Young families find their perfect fit
Median Home
$449,366
Population
103,842
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A
Midwest
View Fishers, IN →
D
66.5 Score
Reedley, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$391,683
Population
25,958
Crime
High
Walk Score
50
Pacific
View Reedley, CA →