Fitchburg, MA vs Sanger, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Fitchburg
67
#1469 nationally
Sanger
68
#1364 nationally
Sanger leads in walk score (48 vs 43). Sanger leads in average commute (24.1 min vs 26.1 min). Fitchburg leads in cost of living index (111 vs 120).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Fitchburg, MA | Sanger, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 67 (#1469) | 68 (#1364) |
| Population | 41,579 | 26,343 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $409,654 | $416,982 |
| Median Household Income | $65,963 | $69,333 |
| Average Commute | 26.1 min | 24.1 min |
| Walk Score | 43 | 48 |
| Crime Level | 13.3 | 13.3 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 111 | 120 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+10.0 | R+4.4 |
D+
67 Score
Fitchburg, MA
Small Massachusetts city with local appeal
Median Home
$409,654
Population
41,579
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
43
Northeast
View Fitchburg, MA →
D+
68 Score
Sanger, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$416,982
Population
26,343
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
48
Pacific
View Sanger, CA →