Florence, AZ vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Florence
72.2
#918 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga leads in walk score (41 vs 16). Florence leads in crime level (3.3 vs 8.0). Florence leads in cost of living index (103 vs 159).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Florence, AZ | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.2 (#918) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 24,291 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $331,009 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $74,025 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 31.8 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 16 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 3.3 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 103 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+22.1 | R+2.1 |
C-
72.2 Score
Florence, AZ
Small Arizona city with local appeal
Median Home
$331,009
Population
24,291
Crime
Low
Walk Score
16
Southwest
View Florence, AZ →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Florence for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: