Folsom, CA vs Grayslake, IL
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Folsom
67.8
#1378 nationally
Grayslake
76.3
#362 nationally
Grayslake leads in crime level (1.8 vs 5.0). Grayslake leads in cost of living index (108 vs 165). Folsom leads in median household income ($134,935 vs $110,662).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Folsom, CA | Grayslake, IL |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 67.8 (#1378) | 76.3 (#362) |
| Population | 84,782 | 20,954 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $763,818 | $374,561 |
| Median Household Income | $134,935 | $110,662 |
| Average Commute | 26.1 min | 28.7 min |
| Walk Score | 31 | 28 |
| Crime Level | 5.0 | 1.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 165 | 108 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+19.7 | D+20.8 |
D+
67.8 Score
Folsom, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$763,818
Population
84,782
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
31
Pacific
View Folsom, CA →
C
76.3 Score
Grayslake, IL
Small Illinois city with local appeal
Median Home
$374,561
Population
20,954
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
Midwest
View Grayslake, IL →
Try a different matchup
Swap Folsom for: