Folsom, CA vs McKinney, TX
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Folsom
67.8
#1378 nationally
McKinney
73.5
#726 nationally
McKinney leads in cost of living index (111 vs 165). Folsom leads in walk score (31 vs 24). Folsom leads in median household income ($134,935 vs $108,542).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Folsom, CA | McKinney, TX |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 67.8 (#1378) | 73.5 (#726) |
| Population | 84,782 | 208,867 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $763,818 | $480,265 |
| Median Household Income | $134,935 | $108,542 |
| Average Commute | 26.1 min | 30.2 min |
| Walk Score | 31 | 24 |
| Crime Level | 5.0 | Very Low |
| School Rating | N/A | 8.8 |
| Cost of Living Index | 165 | 111 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+19.7 | R+11.2 |
D+
67.8 Score
Folsom, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$763,818
Population
84,782
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
31
Pacific
View Folsom, CA →
C
73.5 Score
McKinney, TX
Historic downtown meets modern growth
Median Home
$480,265
Population
208,867
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A
Southwest
View McKinney, TX →