Folsom, CA vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Folsom
67.8
#1378 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Folsom leads in crime level (5.0 vs 8.0). Rancho Cucamonga leads in walk score (41 vs 31). Folsom leads in median household income ($134,935 vs $105,534).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Folsom, CA | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 67.8 (#1378) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 84,782 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $763,818 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $134,935 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 26.1 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 31 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 5.0 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 165 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+19.7 | R+2.1 |
D+
67.8 Score
Folsom, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$763,818
Population
84,782
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
31
Pacific
View Folsom, CA →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Folsom for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: