Folsom, CA vs Sugar Land, TX
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Folsom
67.8
#1378 nationally
Sugar Land
75
#525 nationally
Sugar Land leads in crime level (2.1 vs 5.0). Sugar Land leads in cost of living index (125 vs 165). Folsom leads in average commute (26.1 min vs 30 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Folsom, CA | Sugar Land, TX |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 67.8 (#1378) | 75 (#525) |
| Population | 84,782 | 108,515 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $763,818 | $449,277 |
| Median Household Income | $134,935 | $132,247 |
| Average Commute | 26.1 min | 30 min |
| Walk Score | 31 | 28 |
| Crime Level | 5.0 | 2.1 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 165 | 125 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+19.7 | D+1.6 |
D+
67.8 Score
Folsom, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$763,818
Population
84,782
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
31
Pacific
View Folsom, CA →
C
75 Score
Sugar Land, TX
Mid-size Texas city with community character
Median Home
$449,277
Population
108,515
Crime
Low
Walk Score
28
Southwest
View Sugar Land, TX →