Foster City, CA vs Pico Rivera, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Foster City
63.9
#1730 nationally
Pico Rivera
62.5
#1852 nationally
Foster City leads in crime level (1.9 vs 12.8). Foster City leads in median household income ($191,267 vs $82,539). Pico Rivera leads in cost of living index (148 vs 276).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Foster City, CA | Pico Rivera, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 63.9 (#1730) | 62.5 (#1852) |
| Population | 32,180 | 59,189 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $1,863,228 | $753,964 |
| Median Household Income | $191,267 | $82,539 |
| Average Commute | 32.4 min | 30.8 min |
| Walk Score | 50 | 59 |
| Crime Level | 1.9 | 12.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 276 | 148 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+50.3 | D+32.9 |
D
63.9 Score
Foster City, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,863,228
Population
32,180
Crime
Low
Walk Score
50
Pacific
View Foster City, CA →
D-
62.5 Score
Pico Rivera, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$753,964
Population
59,189
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
59
Pacific
View Pico Rivera, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Foster City for: