Framingham, MA vs Pasadena, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Framingham
64.6
#1685 nationally
Pasadena
61.6
#1898 nationally
Pasadena leads in walk score (69 vs 42). Framingham leads in crime level (8.9 vs 13.2). Framingham leads in cost of living index (145 vs 197).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Framingham, MA | Pasadena, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 64.6 (#1685) | 61.6 (#1898) |
| Population | 71,875 | 133,560 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $671,985 | $1,206,740 |
| Median Household Income | $94,909 | $97,818 |
| Average Commute | 30.3 min | 27.9 min |
| Walk Score | 42 | 69 |
| Crime Level | 8.9 | 13.2 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 145 | 197 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+39.5 | D+32.9 |
D
64.6 Score
Framingham, MA
Massachusetts community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$671,985
Population
71,875
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
42
Northeast
View Framingham, MA →
D-
61.6 Score
Pasadena, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$1,206,740
Population
133,560
Crime
Moderate-High
Walk Score
69
Pacific
View Pasadena, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Framingham for: