Frisco, TX vs Lake Forest, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Frisco
72.4
#895 nationally
Lake Forest
65.3
#1638 nationally
Lake Forest leads in walk score (41 vs 26). Frisco leads in cost of living index (118 vs 181). Lake Forest leads in average commute (24.6 min vs 29.4 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Frisco, TX | Lake Forest, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 72.4 (#895) | 65.3 (#1638) |
| Population | 219,587 | 85,840 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $649,173 | $1,187,225 |
| Median Household Income | $134,891 | $128,358 |
| Average Commute | 29.4 min | 24.6 min |
| Walk Score | 26 | 41 |
| Crime Level | Very Low | 4.0 |
| School Rating | 9.2 | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 118 | 181 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | R+11.2 | D+2.6 |
C-
72.4 Score
Frisco, TX
Sports City USA
Median Home
$649,173
Population
219,587
Crime
Very Low
Schools
A+
Southwest
View Frisco, TX →
D
65.3 Score
Lake Forest, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$1,187,225
Population
85,840
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Lake Forest, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Frisco for: