Fulshear, TX vs South Pasadena, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Fulshear
70.8
#1054 nationally
South Pasadena
63.6
#1760 nationally
Fulshear leads in crime level (1.6 vs 5.8). Fulshear leads in cost of living index (144 vs 228). Fulshear leads in median household income ($170,602 vs $127,882).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Fulshear, TX | South Pasadena, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 70.8 (#1054) | 63.6 (#1760) |
| Population | 42,616 | 25,623 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $504,786 | $1,707,701 |
| Median Household Income | $170,602 | $127,882 |
| Average Commute | 39.4 min | 30.6 min |
| Walk Score | N/A | 67 |
| Crime Level | 1.6 | 5.8 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 144 | 228 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+1.6 | D+32.9 |
Data coverage note: Fulshear is missing data for 1 metric that South Pasadena has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
C-
70.8 Score
Fulshear, TX
Small Texas city with local appeal
Median Home
$504,786
Population
42,616
Crime
Low
Median Income
$170,602
Southwest
View Fulshear, TX →
D
63.6 Score
South Pasadena, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,707,701
Population
25,623
Crime
Moderate-Low
Walk Score
67
Pacific
View South Pasadena, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Fulshear for: