Garner, NC vs Holladay, UT
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Garner
68.5
#1312 nationally
Holladay
69.6
#1185 nationally
Holladay leads in crime level (2.7 vs 9.8). Holladay leads in walk score (36 vs 23). Holladay leads in average commute (19.4 min vs 27.8 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Garner, NC | Holladay, UT |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 68.5 (#1312) | 69.6 (#1185) |
| Population | 35,265 | 30,298 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $385,396 | $851,133 |
| Median Household Income | $77,171 | $106,099 |
| Average Commute | 27.8 min | 19.4 min |
| Walk Score | 23 | 36 |
| Crime Level | 9.8 | 2.7 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 106 | 139 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+25.6 | D+10.2 |
D+
68.5 Score
Garner, NC
Small North Carolina city with local appeal
Median Home
$385,396
Population
35,265
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
23
Southeast
View Garner, NC →
D+
69.6 Score
Holladay, UT
Small Utah city with local appeal
Median Home
$851,133
Population
30,298
Crime
Low
Walk Score
36
West
View Holladay, UT →