Garner, NC vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Garner
68.5
#1312 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga
63
#1806 nationally
Rancho Cucamonga leads in walk score (41 vs 23). Garner leads in cost of living index (106 vs 159). Rancho Cucamonga leads in median household income ($105,534 vs $77,171).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Garner, NC | Rancho Cucamonga, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 68.5 (#1312) | 63 (#1806) |
| Population | 35,265 | 174,405 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $385,396 | $788,806 |
| Median Household Income | $77,171 | $105,534 |
| Average Commute | 27.8 min | 33 min |
| Walk Score | 23 | 41 |
| Crime Level | 9.8 | 8.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 106 | 159 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+25.6 | R+2.1 |
D+
68.5 Score
Garner, NC
Small North Carolina city with local appeal
Median Home
$385,396
Population
35,265
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
23
Southeast
View Garner, NC →
D
63 Score
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Mid-size California city with community character
Median Home
$788,806
Population
174,405
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
41
Pacific
View Rancho Cucamonga, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Garner for:
Swap Rancho Cucamonga for: