Garner, NC vs Redlands, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Garner
68.5
#1312 nationally
Redlands
66.3
#1561 nationally
Redlands leads in walk score (40 vs 23). Garner leads in cost of living index (106 vs 144). Redlands leads in median household income ($94,473 vs $77,171).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Garner, NC | Redlands, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 68.5 (#1312) | 66.3 (#1561) |
| Population | 35,265 | 72,556 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $385,396 | $639,363 |
| Median Household Income | $77,171 | $94,473 |
| Average Commute | 27.8 min | 24.9 min |
| Walk Score | 23 | 40 |
| Crime Level | 9.8 | 8.2 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 106 | 144 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+25.6 | R+2.1 |
D+
68.5 Score
Garner, NC
Small North Carolina city with local appeal
Median Home
$385,396
Population
35,265
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
23
Southeast
View Garner, NC →
D
66.3 Score
Redlands, CA
California community balancing growth and livability
Median Home
$639,363
Population
72,556
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
40
Pacific
View Redlands, CA →