Glenn Heights, TX vs San Bruno, CA
Side-by-side comparison of housing, income, commute, safety, and quality of life.
Score Snapshot
No universal winner
Scores summarize the published model. Use the objective metric differences below and your own priorities to choose.
Glenn Heights
69
#1263 nationally
San Bruno
63.5
#1767 nationally
Glenn Heights leads in cost of living index (100 vs 214). San Bruno leads in median household income ($131,669 vs $87,686). San Bruno leads in average commute (26.3 min vs 31.2 min).
Metric-by-Metric Breakdown
| Metric | Glenn Heights, TX | San Bruno, CA |
|---|---|---|
| WhereAtHome Score | 69 (#1263) | 63.5 (#1767) |
| Population | 18,793 | 41,327 |
| Typical Home Value (ZHVI) | $331,753 | $1,308,809 |
| Median Household Income | $87,686 | $131,669 |
| Average Commute | 31.2 min | 26.3 min |
| Walk Score | N/A | 56 |
| Crime Level | 6.4 | 7.0 |
| School Rating | N/A | N/A |
| Cost of Living Index | 100 | 214 |
| Political lean County 2024 presidential margin — context only, not scored | D+22.2 | D+50.3 |
Data coverage note: Glenn Heights is missing data for 1 metric that San Bruno has. Scores with less coverage are penalized — see our methodology.
D+
69 Score
Glenn Heights, TX
Small Texas city with local appeal
Median Home
$331,753
Population
18,793
Crime
Moderate
Median Income
$87,686
Southwest
View Glenn Heights, TX →
D
63.5 Score
San Bruno, CA
Small California city with local appeal
Median Home
$1,308,809
Population
41,327
Crime
Moderate
Walk Score
56
Pacific
View San Bruno, CA →
Try a different matchup
Swap Glenn Heights for: